ISO 14001 (which is a piece of ISO 14000 group of standards) and the Eco-Management Audit Scheme (EMAS) are both ecological administration frameworks (EMS) and pointed towards cleaner generation. Cleaner creation alludes to the administration of natural projects, which empower associations to improve effectiveness and gainfulness while keeping up ecological assurance and reducing ecological effect. Associations may configuration, execute and keep up ecological projects without looking for certification for any EMS standard. Be that as it may, viable administration of natural projects is regularly accomplished when taking premise from any of the standards.
What is the Difference between the Two?
ISO 14001 was made by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and in this manner is appropriate to associations around the world. It is a piece of a progression of ISO standards for worldwide deliberate natural administration. It tends to the various zones of ecological administration including EMS, natural inspecting and related Investigations (EA&RI), ecological execution assessment (EPE), and life cycle evaluation (LCA).
EMAS then again was made by the European Union (EU) and subsequently is pertinent to associations in EU. It is an administration device intended for improving the ecological presentation of associations in the EU. Made in 1995, EMAS was initially selective to associations in the modern division. It got accessible to different segments since 2001. EMAS is in like manner a willful apparatus for natural administration.
In any case, tư vấn iso 14001 is a result of coordinated effort of various nation agents around the world. It is helpful for all phases of monetary improvement under a wide scope of legislative frameworks. EMAS is explicitly created to meet the prerequisites and targets of the various individuals from the EU. Albeit intentional, EMAS includes lawful status inside Member States, so it can take a progressively administrative position with respect to ecological concerns. ISO gave in its site the fundamental distinction between ISO 14000 and EMAS being that the previous standards are deliberate instruments though the last is a guideline.
What is more, ISO 14001 applies to a wide range of associations, even those not occupied with business or trade. In the interim, EMAS is progressively prohibitive to industry players. In any case, it must be noticed that in 2009, EMAS was reconsidered to improve its relevance and validity. At present, EMAS is available to worldwide associations, regardless of whether private or open.
EMAS seems, by all accounts, to be progressively prohibitive with regards to consistence in that one of its prerequisites is consenting to ISO 14001 and its group of standards. Besides that, enrolled associations with EMAS must show validity in execution, straightforwardness in giving intermittent ecological execution reports, persistent improvement in natural execution, full consistence with pertinent enactment, and drawing in partners in the undertaking.